|
|
Post by babyfacedassassin24 on Dec 7, 2017 10:47:26 GMT -8
If WOL had been a theatrical release, and let's face it, it could almost pass as one, do you think Michelle would have had a better chance at the Oscar?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Dec 7, 2017 11:02:34 GMT -8
I reluctantly voted No (the second option). The script was just not good enough and it was fairly boring. I liked it the first time I watched, but after repeated viewings, it doesn't hold up that well. That said, I think De Niro and Pfeiffer still would have been in the conversation, though, because they play real people and they are quite good.
|
|
|
|
Post by michaelh on Dec 8, 2017 4:14:21 GMT -8
WOL is a good film but it isn't at the level of HBO's best docu-dramas let alone Oscar nominated films based on real life events.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pfeiffer-Pfan on Dec 8, 2017 7:45:00 GMT -8
Her part wouldn't have been juicy enough to propel her to an Oscar Nom... plus, while the story is interesting, I don't think it would be as engaging for the voters as something like 'I, Tonya' or 'Still Alice' from a few years back.
|
|
